RESEARCH INTEGRITY / EDITORIAL PROCESS

Editorial Policy

Minimal in presentation. Rigorous in evidence.

Source-first analysis

Claims are linked to primary research whenever practical. Company announcements, preprints, peer-reviewed studies, independent replication and prospective clinical validation are not interchangeable evidence categories.

Author responsibility

Research perspectives carry an identifiable personal byline. The named author reviews the final wording, scientific claims, citations and conclusions before approval. Unreviewed drafts are not published as approved perspectives.

AI-assisted preparation

AI tools may assist with literature discovery, comparison and early drafting. AI output is not itself verification. The author remains responsible for validating cited sources and approving publication.

Transparency and corrections

Material financial or professional conflicts relevant to an article are disclosed where applicable. Substantive corrections should be dated and documented. Updates must not silently turn tentative results into established findings.

The website provides research commentary rather than individualized medical advice.